As organisations scale, HubSpot often moves from being “just the CRM” to becoming a critical operational system. It needs to connect with finance platforms, provisioning systems, support tools, internal workflows and reporting environments.
The question isn’t whether HubSpot can integrate. It’s: How do you integrate HubSpot in a way that improves speed, accuracy and visibility without creating brittle, tightly coupled systems that introduce more risk over time?
That was the challenge Concentrate embraced in working with Enable, a fibre broadband provider, to redesign how HubSpot interacted with multiple downstream systems.
Their challenges were common in growing tech environments:
Rather than layering on more automation, we re-architected how HubSpot functioned inside their revenue engine to build a scalable, event-driven integration that aligns with real operational stages.
Below, we break those lessons down into the technical and operational questions teams are actually searching for when trying to integrate HubSpot properly in a complex environment.
Answer:
This was exactly the challenge Enable faced. Their sales activity lived inHubSpot, but operational and financial processes lived elsewhere. That meant manual re-keying of information, inconsistent records, and delays between a deal being closed and the next step in provisioning or billing.
To fix this, Concentrate and Enable co-designed a modular, event-driven architecture where HubSpot integrates with other platforms via an intermediary service (in this case, a custom “Deal Model” microservice that processes events in real time). This architecture decouples systems, avoids direct dependencies, and lets data flow automatically across systems without manual re-entry.
The result? Consistent data across platforms, reduced manual effort, better visibility and faster resolution of operational blockers.
Answer:
Enable’s teams were previously spending valuable time transferring data between systems, a common issue in scaling organisations.
Concentrate re-engineered their HubSpot deal pipelines and lifecycle stages to act as the operational trigger point. Custom workflows were built so that once a deal reached specific stages in HubSpot, structured data was pushed into the relevant systems automatically.
HubSpot became the single source of truth, with automation managingthe handover. This reduced errors and freed teams to focus on higher-value work.
Answer:
Before the project, there were bottlenecks between contract signing, provisioning and invoicing.
Concentrate helped Enable tighten this process by:
Because HubSpot now drives the workflow, Enable reduced delays between “Closed Won” and service delivery, directly improving time to revenue.
Answer:
For Enable, it wasn’t just about installing HubSpot, it was about architecting it properly to fit into their existing infrastructure.
Concentrate:
Instead of forcing different systems to talk directly, this design decouples them so each system can evolve independently while still sharing data reliably.
Answer:
Previously, pulling accurate performance data required manual compilation from multiple systems.
As part of the implementation, Concentrate built structured reporting dashboards inside HubSpot. Because deal data is now accurate andsynced with operational systems, leadership can view:
This shifted Enable from reactive reporting to proactive management.
Answer:
Technology alone doesn’t solve process problems.
Concentrate worked closely with Enable to align sales, operations and finance around clearly defined stages and responsibilities inside HubSpot. By making HubSpot the operational trigger point - not just a sales tool - adoption became necessary and valuable.
When teams could see that updating HubSpot directly impacted provisioning and billing efficiency, engagement increased naturally.
Enable’s transformation shows that complex HubSpot integrations need more than point-to-point connectors; they require architectural thinking that:
For organisations battling friction between sales, service and finance, the real question isn’t:
“Do we need more tools?”
It’s:
“Is our CRM architected to drive the entire revenue engine?”
Read the full Enable success story to see how this integration was implemented